About Kesher Talk


NPJrecipe-sidead.jpg

Recent Comments

  • Fat Man [TypeKey Profile Page] on Che Moods : ""In plain truth, he hardly cared for them at all." And Che? He didn't give...."

« Antisemitism watch | Home | Designy cool stuff »

November 26, 2004

More on antisemitism in ultra-violet America

I got an email (author wishes to remain anonymous) in reference to the Somerville divestment initiative:
As a Somerville resident, I was interested to see your post about the divestment vote there, which I had known nothing about. What I did know of was that about two weeks ago, I walked out the door in the morning to find my street saturated with anti-Israel posters. The creepy aspect of it was that instead of being spaced along main streets, where any sane person would place them to advertise a political point, there were scores of them in a 3x3 square block of small, residential back streets, with multiple posters stapled to literally every tree and telephone pole.

There was no mention of any specific group or activity, which is why I'm slightly relieved to hear that they must have been associated with that resolution, and not completely divorced from anything. I was wondering why in what was perhaps the most positive week on the Israeli- Palestinian front in years someone had decided to go so berserk over the issue.

A few points, while I'm writing:

1) Somerville is more Cambridge's blue-collar, heavily Portuguese neighbor than the NPR-ish place you seem to think it is.

2) The Muslim center may be behind the resolution (and I'm sure there's Saudi money in there somewhere) but the people who front the anti-Israel stuff are your standard Trotskyist crackpots.

3) Also in the neighborhood is the current location of the Islamic Society. The thing is -- I don't want to have a problem with them. I don't need my community turning into some LGF'ian culture clash, and I want Muslims to fit into the US the way Jews and Buddhists and Hindus do. But story after story coming out of there makes it clear that these are not "moderates" and as the Solomonia guy points out, wishing them to be moderates won't make it so.

(My impression of Somerville is based on the fact that since 1968 it has been the home of the granddaddy of all crunchy social activist havurot, which inspired the Jewish Catalogs and spawned many of today's progressive Jewish elite, and many of the members live nearby.)

If you live in the area, here is an update on how you can testify on this issue. You have till Dec. 1st.

UPDATE: More Presbyterians dissenting from the decisions of their governing body. (I'm linking to Meryl's post since you have to register for the Chicago Tribune.)

UPDATE: [12-16-04] Somerville votes against divestment.

Judith | 11/26/04 at 03:50 PM | Categories: - Divestment watch

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/3477

Comments

You've got Somerville just right when you label it "ultraviolet America." Back in the day, when my Dad's family lived in Roxbury, Somerville was just another working-class hole; like the Southies but without the charm.

Today, it's become an outpost for all the chowderheads who wish they could but can't afford high-rent Cambridge.

Anti-semites? In Boston? Yes. Big-time; the Yankees, the Irish, and now, the liberal intellectual "elite", joined by their new friends, the Islamofascists.

I thank God that my Dad moved to the Bronx just before I was born.

John Luke | November 28, 2004 08:45 PM

I'm a Somerville resident and a member of Congregation B'nai B'rith in Somerville. Some members of our shul spoke in favor of the resolution, others spoke against it. There is no consensus, and the shul officially took no position at all.
-- Ron Newman (rnewman@thecia.net)

Anonymous | November 29, 2004 04:17 PM

As a former resident of the hell city known as Boston, I must point out that the fact that anti-Israel activity is pushed by "Trotskyist crackpots" makes no difference whatsoever. Boston is so liberal-left that most of its residents still cling to the 1930s-era idea that communists are just liberals in a hurry. I'm sure most Bostonians consider the divestniks to be concerned and sincere advocates of peace and injustice and not frenzied totalitarian anti-Semites.

benjamin | November 29, 2004 05:31 PM

I am amazed that any regular shul-goer, no matter how liberal, would approve of divesting in Israel. then I thought of a few people in my old shul in Austin who would speak in favor of it. But I can't imagine enough people in that shul, or any of the liberal ones I know in NYC, being in favor of it to the extent that the congregation would abstain from condemning it.

I guess I am amazed after all.

do your congregants know where the funding and support for this divestment effort is coming from?

Judith | November 29, 2004 09:06 PM

As far as I know, nobody in the congregation actively participated in the Somerville Divestment Project, drafting its resolution or circulating its petitions.

However, once this resolution was before the Board of Aldermen, some congregation members felt that supporting it was an appropriate way to express disapproval of the policies of Ariel Sharon and the Likud government. Others did not. Sharon, Likud, and Bush are quite unpopular here.

I know nothing about the funding of the Divestment Project.

-- Ron Newman (rnewman@thecia.net)

Anonymous | November 30, 2004 08:56 AM

Some articles on the subject, from various viewpoints:

Jewish Telegraphic Agency. This was written by Penny Schwartz, a member of my shul, originally for Boston's weekly Jewish Advocate. Article is titled "In Boston suburb, heated debate over resolution to divest from Israel".

The Jerusalem Post. Article is titled "Boston suburb may become first US city to divest from Israel".

The Electronic Intifada, a pro-Palestinian web site. Article is titled "Sell-by date of war crimes about to expire in Somerville, MA?"

I also recommend Google News, and especially the links to The Somerville Journal, our local weekly. They have run many articles and opinion pieces on this subject over the past month.

-- Ron Newman (rnewman@thecia.net)

Anonymous | November 30, 2004 02:11 PM

I'll make one more comment, then I'll shut up and listen to everyone else:

Above, you mentioned Havurat Shalom in Somerville. I do not know how its congregants feel about the divestment proposal. While a number of speakers on both sides identified themselves as members of my shul, nobody identified him or herself as a member of the havurah.

I did not make any statement of my own at this meeting. I have friends on both sides of the issue.

-- Ron Newman (rnewman@thecia.net)

Anonymous | November 30, 2004 05:22 PM

Comments are now closed for this entry.