About Kesher Talk


NPJrecipe-sidead.jpg

Recent Comments

  • Fat Man [TypeKey Profile Page] on Che Moods : ""In plain truth, he hardly cared for them at all." And Che? He didn't give...."

« Disengagement and Tisha B'Av | Home | The most breathtakingly ludicrous comparison I have seen in a while »

August 15, 2005

D-Day: Disengagement

Gaza disengagement mega-site from the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations. News, analysis, official documents, maps: you name it, it's all here.

The Gaza disengagement has been conspicuous by its absence from this blog for several months. I have to plead guilty to some of these attitudes, even though I have been following the situation out of the corner of my eye via the Jewish and anti-terror blogs I read. I also find it hard to write about because I think both sides have very good arguments. To turn that perspective on its head, and get closer to the truth: there are no good arguments. All the available solutions are lose-lose.

To me, the case for disengagement is slightly less lose-lose than the case for continuing to expend much time and money and IDF lives protecting a few thousand people. Yes, Hamas will see it as a victory. Yes, Gaza will become a new terrorist state. Yes, there is Jewish ancient history and roots in Gaza as well as Judea and Samaria. Yes, it is a government ethnically cleansing its own people, if you want to turn on the emotional soundbites.

The alternative is to continue to expend a lot of resources riding herd on said terrorists - for the forseeable future? Now is the best time to jettison a no-win situation, with the most Israel-sympathetic US administration in decades (yeah I know, Condi Rice, AIPAC spies, blah blah blah), with three years left to guard Sharon's flank after he declares war on the new state of Palestine the minute another rocket comes over the fence. (If the Palestinians were smart, they would be peaceful and conciliatory until Bush leaves office. But they've never been that smart.) Perhaps Gaza will erupt in all-out civil war and save Sharon the trouble. (A side benefit is that the attendant anguish and the reality of giving something for nothing will make withdrawal from the West Bank harder to sell.)

We deposed Saddam partly because hanging on to the status quo was putting us in a progressively worse position, and 9-11 illustrated that so vividly that even an avowedly isolationist president had to get off his butt and pay attention. To determinedly uproot terrorism at its core by getting rid of as many enablers as we can, put the rest on notice, and assist those willing to change to develop representative governments, is a longterm project with no end in sight. A million things can go wrong to derail it or let it run out of steam. But the only way out is through. Same with Gaza.

Some other perspectives on the disengagement:

Oliver Kamm has his usual cogent remarks on this topic. Read the whole thing.

A Blue and Orange love story.

Lots of running commentary from Imshin, just scroll.

Tel Aviv, August 11th. 300,000 people.
Jerusalem, August 10th. 100,000 people.
In a country of only six million. (via Bokertov, Boulder.)
More photos from OU.

Israeli Leftists against disengagement.

Rick Richman collects some pros and cons from the NY Jewish Week.

LGF is hosting Gaza Watch, where you can scroll through photos sent in by ordinary people on site.

Ben Chorin reports from the protests and concludes with a fable.

Naomi Regan.

UPDATE: Just in case you thought the Left was in favor of disengagement, read this paranoid essay over at Norm's place.

Judith | 08/15/05 at 08:07 AM | Categories: Eretz Yisrael

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/3906

Blogs which link to D-Day: Disengagement:

» Havel Havelim #38 from Kesher Talk
Welcome to the latest edition of the Jewish blog carnival, Havel Havelim. I’m not going to include any new posts of my own, but I made a few editorial comments in parentheses with links to some older entries of mine,... [Read More]

Tracked on September 26, 2005 10:23 AM

» "After the expulsion, no words will convince them that we intend to stay here forever." from Kesher Talk
The headline says:Israeli-American Nobel winner doubts Israel's long-term survival The article says, basically, that Israel is suffering from the same postmodern multicultural fatigue as Europe. . . .... [Read More]

Tracked on October 17, 2006 06:57 AM

Comments

The alternative is to continue to expend a lot of resources riding herd on said terrorists - for the foreseeable future? Staying with the cowboy allusion ... Giving them free rein is the better option?

Oceanguy | August 15, 2005 09:22 AM

Judith, great post.

asher | August 15, 2005 11:58 AM

Like you, I favor the disengagement process. I don't think the continued occupation is indefinitely sustainable; and the settlers' preferred option - promoting Jewish migration to the occupied territories with the objective of incorporating them into Israel proper - just isn't going to happen. They don't have nearly enough support even among Israelis, let alone the outside world, for that to work.

What's left? Well, disengagement, and consolidation within defensible boundaries. But this answer by itself isn't enough, because there's no question that the pro-fascist/terrorist forces will immediately seek to establish a foothold in Palestine.

The only way disengagement makes sense - and I believe this is the case, which is why I support disengagement - is in the context of a broader war against Middle Eastern fascism. As long as the current regimes in Damascus and Tehran are in power, they will continue to make conditions for peace impossible. No combination of words on a treaty and lines on a map will avail until this situation changes.

asher | August 15, 2005 12:10 PM

... Also, I think the terror regimes see themselves as best served by prolonging the conflict itself and not by the establishment of a Palestinian state. Were this not the case, the terror masters would not have worked so hard to derail every approaching peace accord between the Israelis and the Palestinians.

asher | August 15, 2005 12:15 PM

That Norm's place article is quite amazing. It's as if Linda Grant is afraid that the Gaza withdrawal means losing her raison d'etre.

Ohad Efrati | August 16, 2005 08:23 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style and URL links.
My spam filter rejects any word containing "sex" and "poker" - use asterisks like so: "p*ker")