About Kesher Talk


NPJrecipe-sidead.jpg

Recent Comments

« Okay, I see more cluepons are needed | Home | News From Iran »

December 16, 2005

Jewish Policy Forum: Staring into the Abyss That is Iran

This report is by Van Wallach, soon to be a regular Kesher Talk contributor, when we get his MT login all squared away. He emailed me this in the meantime. Van, myself, "Alcibiades," and several other friends attended this panel discussion last Sunday. Van also took photos, which will be posted soon.

Some of the sharpest thought leaders among Jewish conservatives gathered at the Jewish Policy Center forum on Sunday, Dec. 11, at the West Side Institutional Synagogue in New York. The theme that sliced through the two-hour discussion: what can be done, if anything, to counter the onrushing nuclear capabilities of the frothingly anti-Israel leadership in Iran.

Panelists Daniel Pipes, Mona Charen, and Michael Ledeen (all members of the Board of Fellows of the JPC, a non-profit Washington think tank that takes a Jewish and conservative perspective), grappled with the question raised by moderator Michael Medved who asked, aping the tone of liberal arguments, whether the threat of Iran has been left to fester while the U.S. pursues the war in Iraq.

"I don't totally disagree with you," said Pipes, noting the Bush administration has been "overly ambitious" in Iraq" and that he hoped the U.S. would "reduce our intense engagement" for a larger Iraqi role. He said Iraq is "looming as the key issue of the next couple of months" and that "the Bush Administration, frankly, has not been up to speed."

Ledeen pushed the perspective further back, arguing that "Iran has been the central issue from the beginning, but nobody wants to deal with that. Iran has been the key sponsor of terrorism."

Ledeen, who thinks Iran already has nuclear weapons, described the Iran leaders as "they're crazy but they{re not stupid." They have been able to act because no western government has acted to stop the regime, despite the West's knowledge of Iran{s plans and statements.

"It's like watching a psychodrama in slow motion and we know the outcome," Ledeen said in the most sobering moment of the afternoon. "We'll have to go after the Iranians." The framework for that is not a war against Islamic fundamentalism, but rather part of the older war against tyranny, with Ledeen noting that 70 percent of Iranians oppose the regime, hence suggest a willing audience for pro-democracy efforts by the U.S.

Any thinking about moves against Iran always involve Israel, the relentless focus of Iran{s plans. Will Israel attack, as it did against Iraq{s nuclear facilities in 1981? Will Israel team up with the U.S. or do the dirty work needed on behalf of the U.S., and more distantly, the supine Europeans?

Ledeen, again, provided the strongest thoughts, doubting that the U.S. or Israel would attack Iran and also doubting whether such attacks would even work, since he thinks the two countries lack non-nuclear weapons that could stop the Iranian program.

Ultimately, he said, nobody can know the consequences of an attack on Iran, or another attack on the U.S. Hence, the abyss looms, with no sense of its depth or a bridge across it.

The session, before a crowd of about 300 people, touched on other issues as well, beginning with the liberalesque question from Medved, who described himself as "a punk liberal activist (who became) a loveable conservative curmudgeon."

Responses to Medved's questions showed the range of beliefs among Jewish conservatives, with pointed disagreements with the Bush Administration's performance. Pipes expressed his concerns about Iraq, and when asked about tax cuts, Mona Charen said that Republicans in Congress "have failed to take the spending problems as seriously as they should," which she found "disappointing."

"Republicans have lost a tremendous amount of moral authority by not sticking to their principles" of tax cuts and lower spending," she said.

Panelists also lamented the Jewish bashing conservative Christians in the U.S., led most vocally by Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League. Ledeen commented, "Picking fights with Christians is insane. Christians are more pro-Israel than the Jews are." Charen echoed the point, noting, "So many Jews side with people who have nothing good to say about America. I find that reprehensible."

Judith | 12/16/05 at 11:31 AM | Categories: WWIV

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/4329

Comments

Thanks for reporting on the JPC forum. In a vein both more humorous and serious, I noticed on Steven Plaut's blog lyrics to "Bomb Iran" (sung to the tune of the Beach Boys's "Barbara Ann").

Jeremiah | December 16, 2005 06:27 PM

A crowd of 300 seems rather small for such a distinquished guest list. Was the forum well advertized? Just curious, as it seems to me that the survival of Israel has sunk to second place after the bizarre Jewish attachment to 'liberal' politics. What is your impression?

chuck | December 16, 2005 09:22 PM

Testing, 1,2,3

Psychobarb | December 17, 2005 06:22 AM

This post is off-topic for which I apologize but as this is my first time here, I don't see how I can email Ms. Weiss directly. First off, let me congratulate you on a terrific looking site!

I am curious about the piece, "Why Jews tend to be liberal." First question is, "Ms. Wiess did you write it," I beleive you did. And have you had a change of heart since November 2002? This would appear to be the case given your description of the site as coming from a "hawkish Jewish liberal persepctive."

I am curious. Oh, one point. I don't think Jews should be proud of supporting socialism and communism in the past, given these regimes have killed millions. When Jews say to me, (family and friends), "We believe in social justice" and talk about involvement in socialist and communistic causes, I do feel the need to point this out.

I can understand being proud of being on the forefront of the Civil Rights Movement but communism? Come on!

Psychobarb | December 17, 2005 06:31 AM

"A crowd of 300 seems rather small for such a distinquished guest list."

The sanctuary of WSI was completely full, and it's not small. I would guess more than 300.

"And have you had a change of heart since November 2002?"

Not really. That's why I call myself a LIBERAL hawk." But I was never on the left. And my liberalism includes market-driven economics. but I am liberal on social issues, so perhaps I am closer to being libertarian, except I think the govt should fund libraries and art museums.

I supported the invasion of Iraq for social justice reasons as well as strategic reasons.

Yehudit | December 17, 2005 03:33 PM

If we were not in Iraq, we would have no geographic ability to confront Iran.

Robert Schwartz [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 16, 2006 11:31 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style and URL links.
My spam filter rejects any word containing "sex" and "poker" - use asterisks like so: "p*ker")