« Where are the Liberal Hawks of Yesteryear? | Home | UPDATED: A Holocaust Story Produced by Mel Gibson's Company »
December 07, 2005
Moral equivalence in Munich
Gushing review of Spielberg's Munich from FOXNews. Gushing as in:
I would hope at least that the great media antidote to the appeasenik NYTimes and its acolytes would understand that - as far as the Munich massacre is concerned - favoring the Israelis and demonizing the Palestinians is the only stance a decent human being could take. But I guess not. After all, Tony Kushner wrote the script.There will be plenty of debate over whether Spielberg favored the Israelis or demonized the Palestinians in this movie. But the terrific screenplay by Tony Kushner and Eric Roth goes a long way to solve those problems. The Israelis are shown as conflicted by their task; the Palestinians are made multi-dimensional through their own explanation of went on. Spielberg doesn't attempt to address the entire Middle East conflict, just to deal with this moment in 1972.
For those who want to be reminded of what Munich was really about, I hosted a blogburst on the 30th anniversary of the event. Most of the links are still good.
Previous entry on this movie by my co-blogger, with additional links back to other posts on the topic.
UPDATE: I also posted this at Winds of Change, and the comment thread over there is getting interesting. Jim Rockford makes the point that the methods and attitude toward the PLO terrorist hunt was an logical progression from the Nazi hunting of the 50s and 60s, conducted by the same people, which means conflicted feelings about what they were doing would be highly unlikely.
Judith | 12/07/05 at 09:03 AM | Categories: - Munich Massacre
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/4286
Blogs which link to Moral equivalence in Munich:
» Hey Ahmadinejad, let's do lunch from Exit Zero
Munich's Steven Speilberg believes that the solution to Israel's problem is 'talking'
"There is a pivotal scene in which a Mossad...[Read More]
Tracked on December 12, 2005 09:59 AM
Comments
Yes, God forbid we should "demonize" evil. Unbelievable.
mirty | December 7, 2005 10:01 AM
Snort. Soon I imagine we'll be hearing just how brave Spielberg's "interpretation of events" is. Dr. Helen has an interesting take on the self-acclaimed "bravery" of the artistes in our midst here
alcibiades | December 7, 2005 10:52 AM
I think many "intellectuals" are so into the "shades of gray" worldview that they have forgotten that primary colors exist at all. They use what they claim to be their superior understanding of "nuance" as a sign of moral and intellectual superiority.
Here are some thoughts on the whole idea of "nuance" from Arthur Koestler.
David Foster | December 7, 2005 11:59 AM
I feel sick. Too right about moral equivalence! When was the last time he visited Israel, anyway?
Barefoot Jewess | December 7, 2005 02:06 PM
As a sometimes artiste, I've noticed that most are desperate to get a job. They have no intention of standing up to "the Man", because their future employer, the Art Establishment, is the Man.
Once they have a job, most are desperate to keep it. It's very hard to get a job in the traditional arts.
A few artists are important enough not to care or work outside of the old establishment - they're able to stand up to the Man, but if you want a favorable reveiw from the LA Times, the Village Voice or the NYT, you have to spout the traditional anti-American semi-Stalinist rhetoric.
Add to that the fact that some of these actor/artistes were so terrified by 9/11 they spent the following year hiding under their beds. They think their celebrity status makes them vulnerable, and none of them want to be the next Theo Van Gogh. There's just no way they're ever going to criticize the mujahideen.
mary | December 7, 2005 04:22 PM
I think many "intellectuals"...
As if Spielberg were an intellectual. I've always thought of him as a rather obnoxious ten year old. Needless to say, I don't like his movies. I've seen three and swore I would never waste money on another.
chuck | December 7, 2005 07:53 PM
Judith, the blogburst link you provided didn't work for me. I went back in the archives and found this one
http://www.hfienberg.com/kesher/2002_09_01_kesher_archive.html#85415470
Maggie
| December 8, 2005 05:21 PM
Oops, looks like that was cut off. I made it into a tiny url.
Maggie
| December 8, 2005 06:02 PM
Maggie thanks for flagging that. The URL is good except that it ends in php instead of html. My blog switched over a month ago and there are still some loose ends.
Yehudit | December 9, 2005 12:51 AM
Leon W. wrote a negative review in TNR, and David Brooks's column in this week's Sunday Times doesn't look like it takes the side of the film, either.
David | December 11, 2005 11:29 AM












