About Kesher Talk

  • "Kesher" means "connection" in Hebrew. The banner image is the mosaic floor of a 6th c. synagogue in Jericho, showing a menorah flanked by a shofar and lulav; the inscription reads "Shalom Al Yisrael." (This synagogue was destroyed by Arab vandals a few years ago. The condition of the mosaic floor is unknown.)
  • Contributors:
  • Judith Weiss
    admin-at-keshertalk-dot-com
  • Van Wallach
    mission76tx-at-yahoo-dot-com


« Birthday bleg | Home | Russian on Cartoons: A Big "Da" to Free Expression »

February 07, 2006

I question the timing

Anyone tempted to excuse or sympathize with this latest example of "spontaneous" global Muslim outrage needs to take into account that this was a carefully planned propaganda campaign, designed to guilt-trip and intimidate the West, at a time when Europe and the US attitudes toward Islamist terrorism are beginning to converge.

Would a generalized inflaming of the masses on the “cartoon matter” be better before or after the Palestinian elections, by Hamas standards? Before or after the Iraqi elections, by Salafi angle? Before or after the Egyptian elections, by Muslim Brotherhood plans? Before or after the withdrawal from the Lebanese Government, by Hezbollah calculations? Before or after the Iranian decision to rush to the nuclear race, by Ahmedinijad’s planning? And on the top coincidence list was the fact that Denmark was to head the UN Security Council, just as its members were to take Tehran to the UN.
Bingo. [UPDATE: More detail here. And other political agendas are advanced under cover of religious outrage.]

[UPDATE: And opportunities to make a few quick bucks buying wholesale lots of Danish flags to sell to rioters.]

Another example of a carefully orchestrated "outrage" was the Palestinian response to Ariel Sharon's walk on the Temple Mount in 2000. Sharon was set up to provide a justification for the intifada.

Israel's Internal Security Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami permitted Sharon to visit the Temple Mount only after calling Palestinian security chief Jabril Rajoub and receiving his assurance that if Sharon did not enter the mosques, no problems would arise.

. . . . As violence escalated over the following days and weeks, the Palestinians and the media blamed Sharon for the violence. The truth was that the violence started before September 28. The day before, for example, an Israeli soldier was killed at the Netzarim Junction. . . . The next day in the West Bank city of Kalkilya, a Palestinian police officer working with Israeli police on a joint patrol opened fire and killed his Israeli counterpart.

In addition, official Palestinian Authority media exhorted the Palestinians to violence. On September 29, the Voice of Palestine, the PA's official radio station sent out calls "to all Palestinians to come and defend the al-Aksa mosque." The PA closed its schools and bused Palestinian students to the Temple Mount to participate in the organized riots.

Just prior to Rosh Hashanah (September 30), the Jewish New Year, when hundreds of Israelis were worshipping at the Western Wall, thousands of Arabs began throwing bricks and rocks at Israeli police and Jewish worshippers. Rioting then spread to towns and villages throughout Israel, the West Bank and Gaza Strip. . . . In October 2000, Palestinian mobs destroyed Joseph’s Tomb in Nablus, tearing up and burning Jewish prayer books. They stoned worshipers at the Western Wall and attacked Rachel’s Tomb in Bethlehem with firebombs and automatic weapons. . . . Most armed attackers were members of the Tanzim – Arafat’s own militia.

Imad Faluji, the Palestinian Authority Communications Minister, admitted months after Sharon's visit that the violence had been planned in July, far in advance of Sharon's "provocation." "It [the uprising] had been planned since Chairman Arafat's return from Camp David, when he turned the tables on the former U.S. president and rejected the American conditions."


Before you rush to apologize for cultural insensitivity (like these Danish useful idiots), check to see whether you are being used as a character in someone else's play.

(Cross-posted at Winds of Change)

UPDATE: This guy thinks it's about this year's tramplings at the hajj.

. . . . Most of the pilgrims who were killed came from poorer countries such as Pakistan, where the Hajj is a very big story. Even the most objective news stories were suddenly casting Saudi Arabia in a very bad light and they decided to do something about it.

Their plan was to go on a major offensive against the Danish cartoons. The 350 pilgrims were killed on January 12 and soon after, Saudi newspapers (which are all controlled by the state) began running up to 4 articles per day condemning the Danish cartoons. The Saudi government asked for a formal apology from Denmark. When that was not forthcoming, they began calling for world-wide protests. After two weeks of this, the Libyans decided to close their embassy in Denmark. Then there was an attack on the Danish embassy in Indonesia. And that was followed by attacks on the embassies in Syria and then Lebanon.


Well, okay, that too. Everyone benefits from putting the West on the defensive.

Judith | 02/07/06 at 12:47 AM | Categories: WWIV

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/4535

Blogs which link to I question the timing:

» Around the web 2/8/06 from Soccer Dad
Psycho Toddler fantasizes about his wife and another woman. Jack's Shack recalls Arthur Conan Doyle's the Lost World in real life. (I still don't understand why the story is datelined Oslo.) One of the reasons I'm skeptical of claims of... [Read More]

Tracked on February 8, 2006 05:57 AM

» Offensive cartoon offensive from Soccer Dad
Kevin Sullivan reported Turmoil Over Cartoons Began Quietly Among Danes and focuses on the role Ahmed Abu Laban had in publicizing the cartoons. Laban immediately called together 11 other Muslim leaders to plan a response. Eliciting no regrets from the... [Read More]

Tracked on February 9, 2006 09:22 AM

Comments

Good work!

Hootsbuddy | February 7, 2006 02:16 AM

I'm not sure there is any evidence that this was planned, but its obvious that this isn't the first time that Muhammad was treated with something less than respect in Western media. So why now, why not earlier?

It may not have been planned, but obviously the cartoons are merely a peg to hang these feelings on.

S. | February 7, 2006 10:32 AM

"Everyone benefits from putting the West on the defensive."

That would be true if they had, but I think what they may have actually done is put the 'western street' on the offensive... and where the street goes, the politicians will (sooner or later) follow.

Kathy K [TypeKey Profile Page] | February 7, 2006 11:16 AM

It seems to me that the cartoon riots are an attempt to force non-Muslim countries to begin to adhere to the salafi understanding of sharia.

In the US, wouldn't this run afoul of the establishment clause as well as free speech?

BTW, since jihad is an attempt to extend the reach of sharia, these aren't riots. They're acts of war.

Peter B | February 7, 2006 07:37 PM

I think that this current attack on Denmark and the West may work against Islamofascists and Muslims in general.

Paul | February 7, 2006 08:31 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style and URL links.
My spam filter rejects any word containing "sex" and "poker" - use asterisks like so: "p*ker")

CURRENT MOON
lunar phases