« Router Bleg | Home | Geoffrey Chaucer still hath a blogge »
June 04, 2006
Israel and the Arabs: Compare and contrast
Two sequential posts from Augean Stables:
First, turns out a lot of Sudanese Muslim refugees from Darfur want to settle in Israel. And Israel, true to form, is agonizing over how many it can reasonably take in (based not on ethnic demographics, just resources), with Israeli human rights groups going to bat for the Sudanese.
The second post is about the Arab League's position on Darfur, which is a typical mix of denial and complicity and scapegoating.
From the subscriber-only WSJ article:
. . . . the most recent Arab League summit, which took place in the Sudanese capital, Khartoum — presumably as a show of support to the host government — ended with a resolution denying that any massacres had taken place in Darfur and expressing resistance to any outside intervention in the “internal” affairs of an Arab country. (Not surprisingly, this stance is identical to that taken by Osama Bin Laden.) By adopting this argument, the Arab League was not just covering up for the atrocities perpetrated by the Sudanese government, but also for the direct or indirect involvement in this part of the Sudan of some of the Arab governments attending the summit.The article goes on to contrast this behavior not only with Israel's (which is an easy shot) but with that of other African nations:
The contrast between the Arab League’s denial of any massacres in Darfur and the handover of Charles Taylor by the Nigerian government to the U.N.-backed special court in Sierra Leone is telling, to say the least. Taylor, who had received support from some members of the Arab League, will be the first African leader to face war-crimes charges.It remains a serious concern that while many regions of the world are moving forward and finding, with the support of the international community, mechanisms to bring the likes of Chile’s Pinochet, Yugoslavia’s Milosevic and Liberia’s Taylor to justice, the Arab League’s denial of the atrocities in Darfur demonstrates not only disrespect for human life, but proof that the Arab world may be falling into a darkness of which we had only a glimpse in New York, Madrid and London.
As RL points out, "may be falling" is not the tense which reflects reality.
Another contrast, from Treppenwitz, brings to mind the Israeli offered blood donation refused by the Palestinians:
Palestinian child needs a bone marrow transplant, is treated in an Israeli hospital because the Palestinian ones aren't equipped (because Suha needed so many pairs of shoes or militia needed to replace their ammo), PA Ministry of Health has a long history of non-payment of bills, so various Israeli organizations agree to foot most of the bill, requiring the PA to kick in only about 15%. PA Health Minister - who is a doctor - refuses to sign the check because it would be supporting the Zionist enemy.
You might wonder what it is going to take for supposedly civilized people to acknowledge that there is something very wrong here, and no, it's not the Israelis. Well, apparently it takes years of bombings and riots and death threats to dislodge the knee-jerk sympathy for an Arab world oppressed by concepts of Western civilization such as protection of the weak and honest self-examination. Ironically, the academic boycott is just getting into high gear as the rest of Europe starts to shift in the other direction.
Judith | 06/04/06 at 09:32 PM | Categories: - Good news from Israel
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/5055
Comments
Thanks for passing on this story Judith. As you probably noted, I was angry and ashamed that we as consumers of news seem to have given the media the [probably correct] impression that this kind of story holds no interest for us. As much as the media really seems to have a mind (and agenda) of its own these days, it still serves a consumer base and we consumers need to give them feedback when they are not serving our needs.
treppenwitz | June 5, 2006 02:04 AM
thanks, judith, i hadn't even noticed the juxtaposition of the two until you pointed it out.
in a sense, the same split between an arab commoner population that isn't so dumb (they know israel's the only place in the ME that a muslim can be free), and an elite in firm even tyrannical denial, gets replicated in europe where as the commoners (the general public, the average citizen) begin to wake up, the elites are in increasingly shrill denial.
r
rlandes | June 5, 2006 02:41 AM


![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.keshertalk.com/nav-commenters.gif)











