« Mumbai 7/11/06 | Home | Israel/Lebanon/Gaza Roundup »
July 12, 2006
An Act of War, Declares Olmert
Several Murdered, Tank Destroyed.
I started a post last week calling into question the direction of the Gaza Incursion. It seemed to me, at the time, that it was in beginning to look chaotic and losing all direction. And the danger was that it would accomplish neither its primary goal, that of rescuing Gilad Shalit, nor its secondary one, which was getting the Qassam missiles to halt. As well as any other goal it had picked up along the way.
I never finished it though because I had a few qualms. I didn't want to be screaming "quagmire" - sounding like an annoying liberal - when that potentially was not going on at all from an inside view, a view I was not privy to. And I also felt a bit disloyal - since I certainly was for full steam ahead on the operation, going in. So I held off on finishing that particular post, hoping I was incorrect. Though I've certainly never had the faith in Olmert's government that I did in Sharon. Olmert seems a very ideologically confused politician, far more interested in the exercise of power for its own ends.
Clearly, I shouldn't have been so halfhearted about writing my post.
If the operation looked chaotic to me, I should have realized it would look far weaker to Israel's enemies. And that, indeed, proved to be correct, as now Hezbollah has kidnapped two soldiers from the northern border of Israel, with Lebanon, and has sent a barrage of katyushas and mortars into northern town.
I can't see that Israel has many options to get the soldiers back, except to bomb some site in Syria; as Sharon's government did, to much success, several years ago, "to send a message to Syria" to make Hezbollah back off. Syria is controlling these forces. And so, too, is Iran.
I think Olmert has already hinted at this tactic:
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert declared the attack as an "act of war" and not terror. During a press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi Wednesday afternoon, he called it an unprovoked assault by a sovereign nation and held Lebanon, where Hizbullah has a minister in the government, fully responsible.Restrained, but very, very painful sounds like something very, very targeted."Israel's response will be restrained but very, very, very painful," Olmert added.
It is also, to my mind, not the least bit coincidental that this kidnapping happened only a day - or less - after Hosni Mubarak said in remarks published Tuesday that Israel had been ready to make a prisoner exchange - hoping to achieve what end, I wonder now. Obviously, "diplomacy."
But from a more cynical point of view, it looks like this leak was a flashing neon signpost to the terrorists that soldier-kidnapping is the way to go if they ever want to see their men.
Europe, right now, is "pro-Israeli," tut tutting and "expressing concern" and decrying Hezbollah's actions. But we all know that will last only until Israel begins a campaign targeted on Syria or the Hezbollah dominated parts of Lebanon to get the men back. Because Israel is always and in all things an exception to the rules. And soon enough these same leaders, and quite likely Condi Rice's State Department, will start indicating that the incursion is "disproportionate".
By the way, and this is just an aside, now that Condi has come way out of the closet with the same "realist" political philosophy as her old time political mentors, I'm finding I don't much like her approach at all. It's just the same old bullshit.
Lebanon Profile, writing from Lebanon, has an interesting response.
The Israelis overflew Syrian President Bashar Assad's palace in Latakia when Hamas killed two Israelis and kidnapped one. Now, Hezbollah kills Israeli soldiers and kidnaps them.I would respond that the US is, of course, perfectly capable of taking out the Syrian regime, but it lacks the political will to do so. It might gain some of that political will if it realized the extent to which the Iraqi insurgency was still being funded and controlled by the Baathist party, based in Syria.What will the Israelis do to Syria, now (not to mention Lebanon, the Palestinian camps in Lebanon and Syria, the West Bank, and Gaza)?
What are the Syrians and Hezbollah thinking? Goad Israel into an attack? Prove that there isn't much that Israel can do without going into all out offensive war? Get Israel back for Israeli overflights and the 2003 bombing of the Damascus Palestinian refugee camp?
They definitely aren't winning any support in Lebanon, the West, or the rest of the world...
And Hezbollah? This militia is just ridiculous. Westerners are scared out of their minds of being kidnapped by Muslims after all the headchopping that's gone on in Pakistan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. Even domestically, Americans are vigilantly anti-kidnapping. Nothing sets Midwesterners more on edge than an Amber Alert. You'll never get anyone to have sympathy for you by behaving like criminals.
The interesting part is that Syria is powerful enough to call Israel's bluff. Assad's realized that, not only is the West incapable of taking out the Syrian regime, but that Israel can't either. That truly changes things.
Syria's alliance with Iran is really paying off.
Israel, of course, may not now lack the same political will as US forces in Iraq to let off a few bombs in Syria. If Assad felt threatened - as he did - by being buzzed, lets see how he responds to something more vigorous, if that, indeed, is what Olmert has planned for him.
UPDATES to follow...
Alcibiades | 07/12/06 at 08:05 AM | Categories: - The War of Dire Straits
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/5192
Blogs which link to An Act of War, Declares Olmert:
» AN ACT OF WAR from Michelle Malkin
Well, yes, that's exactly what it is: The Hezbollah militant group captured two Israeli soldiers during clashes along the Lebanese border on Wednesday, triggering an Israeli assault with warplanes, tanks and gunboats as Israeli troops crossed the front... [Read More]
Tracked on July 12, 2006 09:36 AM
» Hezbollah Takes Two Israeli Soldiers Hostage from In the Bullpen
Hezbollah has announced that it has taken two Israeli soldiers hostage, a claim confirmed by the IDF. The Hezbollah raid occured on Israeli soil and should be considered an act of war, just as the Hamas taking of an IDF soldier should be considered th... [Read More]
Tracked on July 12, 2006 04:15 PM
» Israel on the Brink from Tammy Bruce
The situation in Israel has gotten even worse. Frankly, while none of us wish war on anyone, there's a point where you have to stop ignoring the enemy. This finally may be the point when Israel ends the 'restraint' and... [Read More]
Tracked on July 12, 2006 04:43 PM
» Israel Army Enters Into Lebanon After Hezbollah Kidnaps Two Soldiers from Pajamas Media
16:41 PDT; Israeli warplanes have destroyed the Palestinian Foreign Ministry building in Gaza, according to the Associated Press. 11:29 AM PDT; Fox News: "Syria and Iran are to blame for the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers by Hezbollah terrorists an... [Read More]
Tracked on July 12, 2006 07:42 PM
» Yaakov Amidror: Israeli government allowed Hezbo.. from Tel-Chai Nation
Major-General Yaakov Amidror provides answers why the Hezbollah is joining the PLO/Hamas in firing rockets at Jewish targets [Read More]
Tracked on July 13, 2006 03:29 PM
» A White House Divided from Kesher Talk
I've been kind of amazed at Condi's support for the war. My impression of her had been that she was much more of the "realist" school; and when it comes to Israel, the realist school always demands capitulation and diplomacy.... [Read More]
Tracked on August 9, 2006 03:17 AM
Comments
'quite likely Condi Rice's State Department, will start indicating that the incursion is "disproportionate"'.
The Bush administration said Wednesday afternoon that “Israel must do whatever necessary to protect itself.”
US: Israel Must Do Whatever Necessary to Protect Itself
"The terse response came in the wake of an IDF incursion into south Lebanon following multiple attacks by Hizbullah terrorists on northern Israeli communities and soldiers. Two soldiers were kidnapped and three were killed in the early morning attacks."
Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't detect anythinglike this action by the IDF being a "disproportionate" response in that statement.
traderrob | July 12, 2006 12:18 PM
Hi traderrob,
Obviously, as you remarked, this initial remark doesn't indicate any hesitance or reference to disproportionate force on the part of the Israelis.
But so, too, the US government's initial response to Israel's incursion into Gaza was also openly supportive and used similar language.
By the next week - and as time went on - the US response - at least its public response - was far more cautionary, etc., asking Israel to tone down the mission. Which is - at least according to reports - the reason Olmert stopped the incursion the first time around.
So I wasn't referencing the initial US response. Which is why I included the phrase, "soon enough." I think that if hostilities continue, the message of the US will change in short enough order.
We only have to wait a little while and see what the tone of the rhetoric amounts to.
Alcibiades | July 12, 2006 12:41 PM
I didn't mean my comment to be perceived as snarky but I sometimes think that Bush gets a bum rap. He has proved to be the most pro-Israel Pres in history and that includes Reagan and Truman.
traderrob | July 12, 2006 05:35 PM
I think he gets a bum rap, too, and in general I'm a big Bush fan. And I agree he has largely been a great friend to Israel. Though even his administration, from time to time, distinguishes categorically between world terror and terror in Israel, as though different rules applied to the latter.
And so I find I'm not always loving this new Condi-at-the-helm-of-the-state-department flavored real politik.
Alcibiades | July 12, 2006 05:55 PM
The answer to the problem is for the Israeli Army to head north and at the appropriate moment take an eastern detour.
BTW on NBC tonight the news was framed: Israel left Lebanon 6 years ago. It left Gaza a year ago. And yet these folks won't leave Israel alone.
The hasbara has changed. Thank you Ariel Sharon.
M. Simon | July 12, 2006 07:46 PM
if you can, tell the Israeli government that if they don't get these men returned alive and well, to take out all of these "prisoners" that Hezbollah wants to exchange for, and shoot them before the setting sun, and live on video.
Bruce | July 21, 2006 04:34 AM
The period during which a developing fetus is carried within the uterus. In humans, pregnancy
averages 266 days (38 weeks) from conception to childbirth. Traditionally, pregnancy duration
is counted from the woman's last menstrual period, which adds roughly 2 weeks to gestational
age. This is how physicians arrive at a pregnancy length of 40 weeks (280 days).
pregnancy | January 3, 2007 11:31 PM
![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.keshertalk.com/nav-commenters.gif)
