« Auto-manipulator of world opinion | Home | More snapshots from Israel »
July 25, 2006
Israel is a mistake, but has the right to defend itself
Richard Cohen sort of walks back his "Israel is a mistake" column of last week (which I fisked here). I'm not going to address here his conflicting advice to "hunker down" yet "strike back." My concern is his continued misunderstanding of Israel's legitimacy.
Readers of my recent column on the Middle East can accuse me of many things, but not a lack of realism. I know Israel's imperfections, but I also exalt and admire its achievements. . . .Cohen's formulation is a variation on a lukewarm defense of Israel which you will see if you spend any time in forums where Israel is discussed: "Israel's creation is problematic, but it's there now, so we have to accept it, and it has the right to defend itself because all these other colonialist invaders did the same thing and we don't want to be hypocrites."Israel is, as I have often said, unfortunately located, gentrifying a pretty bad neighborhood. But the world is full of dislocated peoples, and we ourselves live in a country where the Indians were pushed out of the way so that -- oh, what irony! -- the owners of slaves could spread liberty and democracy from sea to shining sea. As for Europe, who today cries for the Greeks of Anatolia or the Germans of Bohemia?
This isn't good enough.
Cohen still implies that Israel is not native to the neighborhood ("unfortunately located," "gentrifying"), and then names other displaced peoples, reinforcing the implication that Israel is the interloper, the displacer. An accurate summation would briefly acknowledge all the displacement that has gone on: The Romans and Muslims ethnically cleansing Jews from Judea, modern Israel pushing out Palestinian Arabs, Arab nations pushing out Jews who had lived there since before Islam was invented, Arabs pushing each other out, the 3000 year history of Israel as the Jewish homeland, the Arab nations created at the same time as the modern state of Israel . . . .
Cohen still erases this history and paints Israel as a (admirable Westernized democratic) foreigner who has to be tolerated (as a foreigner), rather than as a native who has the same right to its homeland as other natives. It is true that some of these national aspirations conflict with each other, and everyone can't have all of what they want. But there can be no honest and just compromise as long as one of the parties is constantly delegitimized and its history rewritten to suit the other parties' agendas.
The characterization of Israel as a foreigner also reinforces its perceived role as the tip of the American spear. Israel is a Western-style democracy in the region, but it's a native one, which bases its national character on its 3000 year old values (even though they are not perfectly honored at all times).
But one can also use the "gentrifying" metaphor to paint Israel as "local kid who makes good" and then returns to his old neighborhood to help make it better, albeit with the support of outsiders who want the neighborhood cleaned up for everyone's benefit. Some in the neighborhood would be pleased, and many would be suspicious, resentful, protective of their own power, and legitimately concerned that cherished traditions would be indiscriminately thrown in the trash along with the bad. But that metaphor would reflect the facts, and it would undercut some of the propaganda the Arab nations rely on to keep Israel on the defensive.
Cohen's latest column does its small part to perpetuate cliches which contribute to lack of honest discourse on the conflict.
Judith | 07/25/06 at 03:37 PM | Categories: - Antisemitism watch
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/5288
Blogs which link to Israel is a mistake, but has the right to defend itself:
» MidEast War: XLII from Pajamas Media
Smoke rises from Khiam village after being hit by Israeli air strikes, in southern Lebanon. July 25, 2006 12:00 PDT Frequent updates. Scroll. Previous coverage @ right. Links to Lebanese and Israeli bloggers covering the conflict are @ Truth... [Read More]
Tracked on July 25, 2006 06:51 PM
» Does Richard Cohen know that we exist? from Disturbingly Yellow
In his new piece, he responds to two types of critics.
First, those critical of Israel who argue about the “proportionality” of her response to Hezbollah’s rockets and abductions, with a very strong argument in . . . No, It’s Su... [Read More]
Tracked on July 31, 2006 03:06 AM
Comments
It's also worth mentioning that it's not secret the Romans renamed Israel into Palestine in order to weaken the region's Jewish identity. The gift that keeps on giving.
Shimmy | July 25, 2006 04:34 PM
"Muslims ethinically cleansed Jews from Judea"? That is a gross error and a misrepresentation of the historical fact that it was always the Muslim RULERS, from the second Caliph Umar al-Khattab right to the Mamluk rulers and (later on) the Ottomon rulers who allowed Jews to co-exist peacefully and side-by-side with their Muslim and Christian neighbours. The current State of Israel IS a foreign state, an European colony transplanted into the culture of the Middle East.
Theodore Hertzl was not a Jewish Middle Eastern, he was an atheist German. And that is the father of Zionism. Oh btw, the name is not "Judea" any longer, its called "West Bank". Outdated geographical names is for those who have a severe identity problem, no offence.
- MENJ
I did mention that in my fisking.
Judith | July 25, 2006 05:23 PM
Cohen's article is another version of the shifting logic of the the pro Palestinian crowd that has many versions but always gets around to the same result. Everything is Israel's fault and there really shouldn't be a state of Israel. Witness the almost universal statements of "Of course Israel has the right to defend itself" that has shifted to "Israel is defending itself to hard" Huh? If it has the right to defnd itself then it needs to do what it has to do to get the aggressors in this war to surrender or at least stop lobbing missles. The logic of the world opinion should be translated as "You have the right to defend yourself but you can't win."
The ground always shifts. For decades we heard nothing but "two state solution." Arafat and his cronies frustrated almost every two state solution. Now the chattering classes have rewarded Palestinian intransigence by shifting to the newest solution of "the two state solution can't work, so now there should be a single Palestinian state." Gee what a shock. Their answer to the problem is the end of Israel, the solving of the Cohen "mistake" conundrum. Thank God that Israel has a intellectual and theological problem with the notion of suicide.
Kevin Peters
| July 25, 2006 05:33 PM
Menj, I suggest you read my fisking. of Cohen's previous column. I link to some history about Muslim treatment of Jews. If you had 2 columns of data about Christian and Muslim treatment of Jews, the positive and negative would be about equal. Jews fled from Muslim rule to Christian territory just as much as the other way around.
" The current State of Israel IS a foreign state, an European colony transplanted into the culture of the Middle East. Theodore Hertzl was not a Jewish Middle Eastern, he was an atheist German."
Zionism is a 2000 year old movement to return Jews to their country, called Zion among many other names. Its modern form is a national political movement similar to other national movements of the time. It had many fathers and mothers, one of whom was Herzl.
You are implying that European Jews are significantly different from Arab Jews, which isn't true, and that Jewish religion and peoplehood are two separate things, which they aren't.
I know part of ancient Judea is now called the West Bank. But I used its name at the time of the event I referred to, when it was the name of the Jewish nation.
Judith | July 25, 2006 05:49 PM
Menj
While there were rulers who granted great freedoms to minorities like Jews, it was whimsical. It changed when they died. When they woke out of bed angry. When they were replaced. There were European slave owners who also treated their slaves well, and sometimes even set them free or married them. Does that justify slave-owing?
Anyone who supports the right of self-determination for Palestinian Arabs cannot deny a Jewish State. Both were and always were minorities who were crushed by Arab rulers to the point of almost no existence.
Yes, Hertzl was European. That is natural, only Jews in Europe grew to the opportunities of Europe, while Jews indigenous to the Muslims lands were simply trying to feed themselves. Why is is unfair that the Jews with most opportunity facilitated the recreation of Israel?
Further, speaking of "Outdated geographical names", the word Palestine was invented by Europeans too, Romans, who wanted to erase the Jewish identity of Israel. The gift that keeps on giving.
Shimmy | July 25, 2006 06:32 PM
Some people just don't get it.
Ozzie | July 26, 2006 02:13 AM













