About Kesher Talk


NPJrecipe-sidead.jpg

Recent Comments

« Lebanon: You are There | Home | NYC blogger socializing »

August 31, 2006

At the Times, it's dust bowls all the way down

Via a friend:

. . . . the NYT reefers [sic] a big piece on arid conditions in the Great Plains, which have left "farmers and ranchers with conditions that they compare to those of the Dust Bowl of the 1930's." It's the worst drought since … well, maybe 2003, "an extremely dry summer that … brought back memories of the 1930's Dust Bowl" (NYT, Sept. 5, 2003). Or maybe 2002, when "farmers shrug[ed] and wonder[ed] if a new Dust Bowl [would] soon be upon them" (NYT, May 3, 2002). Or 1998: "a dry spell that officials say shows signs of developing into the costliest and most devastating the region has seen since the Dust Bowl years" (NYT, Aug. 12, 1998). Or 1996: "Coming after two years of low rainfall and a number of other weather problems, the ferocity of this year's drought has slowly begun to evoke memories for some here of the Depression-era Dust Bowl" (NYT, May 20, 1996). Or 1988: "Since the spring's dry weather evolved into the worst drought since the Dust Bowl, the farm policy has been turned upside down" (NYT, July 10, 1988). Or 1982: "And when the winds come, turning the sky dark with dust and burying fence rows under shifting dunes of soil and thistle, those who are old enough remember the bleak days of the Dust Bowl." (NYT, May 14, 1982). Or 1980: "Is the nation in for a new Dust Bowl or at least a succession of scorching summers?" (NYT, July 17, 1980).

Friend goes on to say:

A journalist friend from the midwest wrote:
I, too, covered the Dust Bowl for the New York Times. My Oklahoma/Texas Panhandle Dust Bowl was in the late 70's so it predated the ones that have been discovered since.

"In my opinion, the Times does not make Dust Bowls like they used to.


To which I replied:
You know, it's so easy to do a couple of searches in Lexis-Nexis and find this stuff - you wonder why the armies of NYTimes copy editors and fact-checkers don't do it and save themselves some embarrassment.

Well, I don't really wonder. They still think they are above mere fact-checking, because they are the New York Times! This is the same newspaper that wrote a staff editorial - not an op-ed - not too long ago, containing a line about how Bush added the humanitarian/democracy promotion reason for the Iraq War later, after the WMD rationale didn't pan out. Again, 2 minutes of googling would have turned up Bush's 2002 speech before the UN - not exactly an obscure local event - in which he elucidated all the reasons, including the humanitarian one. To wit:
The United States has no quarrel with the Iraqi people; they've suffered too long in silent captivity. Liberty for the Iraqi people is a great moral cause, and a great strategic goal. The people of Iraq deserve it; the security of all nations requires it. Free societies do not intimidate through cruelty and conquest, and open societies do not threaten the world with mass murder. The United States supports political and economic liberty in a unified Iraq.

. . . . If we fail to act in the face of danger, the people of Iraq will continue to live in brutal submission. . . . If we meet our responsibilities, if we overcome this danger, we can arrive at a very different future. The people of Iraq can shake off their captivity. They can one day join a democratic Afghanistan and a democratic Palestine, inspiring reforms throughout the Muslim world. These nations can show by their example that honest government, and respect for women, and the great Islamic tradition of learning can triumph in the Middle East and beyond. And we will show that the promise of the United Nations can be fulfilled in our time.

That's just one example - he said the same thing in many speeches.

Now I have to find that NYTimes op-ed. I remember reading it in the print edition, within the last year. But unlike the Times, I don't have Lexis-Nexis.

PS If you live in NYC and come to dinner with Michael Totten on Monday, and if you get the reference in the title of this post - I will buy you a drink. And I understand this restaurant has very inventive cocktails.

Judith | 08/31/06 at 11:57 AM | Categories: - The Fourth Estate

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/5494

Comments

Great post, but it's t*****s all the way down. (Don't want to ruin it for anyone else.)

Attila (Pillage Idiot) | September 1, 2006 04:10 PM

So are you coming up to visit? I'll buy you a funky martini.

Judith | September 1, 2006 05:59 PM

Judith, I'm sorry I wasn't able to work out the timing. I drove my son to college on Sunday, met some family in Manhattan for dinner, stayed with my mother overnight, and left for home on Monday morning.

Maybe next time.

Attila (Pillage Idiot) | September 4, 2006 09:22 PM

We had a rocking party.

I think Totten was the only one taking pictures so we have to wait till he gets home and downloads from his fancy digital SLR.

Judith Weiss | September 5, 2006 07:45 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style and URL links.
My spam filter rejects any word containing "sex" and "poker" - use asterisks like so: "p*ker")