About Kesher Talk


NPJrecipe-sidead.jpg

Recent Comments

« Rosh Chodesh Ellul begins this Thursday evening | Home | Kesher Talk and Benjamin Kirstein go way back »

August 22, 2006

Introducing the Anti-Chomskyite

My thanks to Judith for inviting me to contribute to Kesher Talk. My name is Benjamin Kerstein, I am originally from Boston, Massachusetts (unfortunately) and currently a student at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Beersheva, Israel. This October I will be relocating to Tel Aviv to pursue my master's degree in Jewish history. My claim to fame (such as it is) is the weblog Diary of an Anti-Chomskyite, which is dedicated to extensive critiques of the works of Noam Chomsky, his acolytes, and other Israel-haters, antisemites, and assorted left wing lunatics. I like to call myself an anarcho-Zionist, but lets just say my politics are fluid. My favorite writers and thinkers include Walter Benjamin, Jacques Derrida, Bret Easton Ellis, Franz Kafka, Michel Houellebecq, Jorges Luis Borges, Emmanuel Levinas, and Echad Ha-Am. My favorite part of the Tanach is the Book of Kohelet (Ecclesiastes). I also enjoy cinema, French cigarettes (far too much), and being an expatriate. I believe Judaism is neither a religion nor a people but a civilization based on a specific relationship to the text and the nothingness from which the text is created (yes, I am sometimes very pretentious). Click below to read my brief musings on the end of the recent war. Like most people over here, I am not happy about it.

I suppose the time has come to write something about the aftermath. Suffice it to say, I am not happy. I stopped posting during the war out of something like frustration married to depression. There did not seem to be much point in opining while scouring the newspapers to see if any of my friends were included in the casualty lists. Thus far, thank God, only one has been wounded, and not critically. This, of course, included the guilt of feeling glad that none of my friends were killed while other's friends were... War is a schizophrenic experience...

No one here thinks this is over and no one here thinks that the war reached a satisfactory ending. Personally, I feel we were very badly led. Olmert announced goals which he did not have the political will to accomplish. The army relied far too heavily on air power at the beginning of the war and did not move quickly enough to use ground forces. When the army did use ground forces, it did so piecemeal and not in force. More than anything else, the war went on far too long. It should have been finished with overwhelming force and as quickly as possible. This did not happen because of Israel's "Lebanon syndrome", the fear of reinacting the war of 1982 and subsequent occupation. This led to the situation in which Olmert declared military goals which he could not achieve without a massive ground invasion. As a result, he shifted his strategy to a political one. In the end, he accepted a cease fire which is unlikely to hold and has given Hezbollah time to rearm. It also places a UNIFIL force in control of the south which may or may not deal with Hezbollah effectively. If they do, Olmert can claim some kind of a victory. If they do not, and this is the most likely scenario, Olmert will have to face total military and political failure and, of course, another war.

In my opinion, the political leadership is running behind the general sentiment of the Israeli people. The general population was prepared for a major war, including a ground invasion. The leadership miscalculated by believing the opposite: that the Israeli people wanted an effective response that did not include a major ground invasion. In the end, this led to the war being long and costly without achieving any major strategic objectives. The government ended up with the worst of both worlds.

Of course, some diplomatic ground has been gained. Hezbollah has taken the lion's share of the blame for the violence and the "international community" (a dubious collective at best) has taken some measure of responsibility for enforcing its own resolutions regarding the disarmament of Hezbollah. These are all just words, however, and it is likely that Israel will soon have to act, rather than talk, in order to safeguard its national security. I think it is very likely that, when the dust settles, it will likely be a new and more rightwing government which undertakes this task.

Benjamin | 08/22/06 at 04:40 PM | Categories: - The War of Dire Straits

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/5444

Comments

Good to see you here as well !

Don't forget Finklestein as well. He deserves a mention ever time Chomsky does

epaminondas | August 22, 2006 07:23 PM

Hey Benjamin, good to see you will be joining us in posting here.

I'm intrigued by your concept of the nothingness from which the text was created, though it is not entirely clear what you mean.

Do you disregard the cultural continuity of the Ancient Near East and its effect on biblical Judaism? Or do you refer to something else when you speak of the nothingness from which the text was created?

Alcibiades | August 22, 2006 07:42 PM

"I like to call myself an anarcho-Zionist, but lets just say my politics are fluid."

So . . . . that would make you the anti-Mobius?

Judith | August 22, 2006 11:05 PM

Judith-
Thank for your very kind compliments in your post above. I really appreciate it. From what I can see at Mobius's blog I'm not so much his opposite as his worst nightmare. I wish he didn't feel the need to steal the name of a very fine graphic artist. Ma l'asot?

Alcibides-
Yes, I'm definately speaking in an anti-historicist context. The unknowable that creates the text and the unknowable that is the Jewish God, i.e. the unknowable that creates the word (and thus the world); this is my interest. The nothingness that is "somethingness", if you like, because we give it an albeit unspeakable name. The relationship to this nothingness, this unknowability, the Tetragrammaton that contains all the permutations of the verb "to be" at once, strikes me as the essence of Judaism. Judaism is therefore an extrapolation/expansion/interpretation of existence, which is itself a text created by the unknowable - the nothingness, if you will - the God between and behind the words; the urge to be disatisfied with the illusory surface of things; the belief that everything has its "pardes".

benjamin | August 23, 2006 04:11 AM

Yet another conscientious mind that Judith has brought to KT!

I like that you posit Judaism as a civilization - it seems to affirm the generous grandeur of Jewish history while doing an end run around both the "race" vs "nation" conundrum (which seems mired in 19th & 20th C. concepts) and the postmodern "post-Zionist" camp.

Jeremiah | August 24, 2006 09:24 PM

"I like that you posit Judaism as a civilization"

Mordechai Kaplan, who invented Reconstructionist Judaism, came up with that concept in the 1920s I believe.

Judith | August 25, 2006 02:35 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style and URL links.
My spam filter rejects any word containing "sex" and "poker" - use asterisks like so: "p*ker")