« It's Hunting Season For Democrats | Home | The Lancet Report »
October 18, 2006
Terrorist enabler Lynne Stewart is sentenced
Lynne Stewart was sentenced to prison yesterday for assisting her former client - Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman - to continue his terrorist activities after he was put behind bars.
Last week we noted the rallies planned by Stewart's fan club and made some recommendations to prepare her for incarceration.
The goverment asked for 30 years, yesterday the judge gave her 28 months. When I found out she was 67 and battling breast cancer, I thought 30 years would be too harsh. Andrew McCarthy makes a case for a stiff sentence, based on the Bush "spit on the street" approach to terrorism vs. Clinton's "forgive and forget" response. Lynne Stewart represents not only herself, not only a movement, but an attitude toward civil society. She has chosen her side in WWIV, and must be made an example of :
In 1999, [Clinton] pardoned 16 members of the FALN terrorist organization which, as Investors Business Daily editorialized last month, “carried out more than 150 bombings in the U.S., including the lunchtime bombing of Fraunces Tavern in New York on Jan. 24, 1975, that killed four.” (Former Clinton advisor Dick Morris has indicated that this was done to help then-First Lady Hillary Clinton win the votes of Puerto Ricans in the anticipated New York Senate race.)On January 20, 2001, moreover, Clinton’s very last acts in power included pardons for two convicted Weather Underground terrorists, Susan Rosenberg and Laura Sue Whitehorn.
Lynne Stewart is a figure who straddles the September 10 and September 11 worlds — the divergent Clinton and Bush counterterrorism models. As the lead-up to her sentencing shows, it matters a great deal which model we choose.
More details about Stewart's crime:
One of the most incendiary communications was a message Stewart herself gave to the Reuters news service in June 2000 in which the sheikh announced his withdrawal of support for a cease-fire between the Egyptian Islamic Group and the Egyptian government.The truce had been in place since 1997, just after his followers in Egypt had opened fire on tourists at the Temple of Hatshepsut in Luxor, killing 58 foreigners and 4 Egyptians. Subsequently, high-casualty Islamist terrorism resumed in Egypt on October 7, 2004, with a series of bombings that killed 34 in and around the Egyptian Sinai resort of Taba. On July 23, 2005, three bombs exploded in the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, killing at least 64.Government investigators searching Stewart's law offices found a draft of the sheikh's fatwa that bin Laden later said inspired him. In it, Abdel Rahman enjoined his fellow Muslims everywhere to kill Americans, even children, "to treat them with brutality," and to "drown their ships, shoot down their airplanes, kill them on earth, in the sea or in the sky, kill them everywhere you find them" in order to obtain his release from U.S. prison.
That's called being an accomplice.
Did you know that Ramsey Clarke brought Stewart onto the defense team? In fact, the partnership of Lynne Stewart with Sheik Rahman is a textbook example of the unholy alliace of the international nihilist Left with the Jihadi fundamentalist Right. Both desire radical change as a good unto itself, no matter what the cost to real live human beings.
Ilich Ramirez Sanchez, better known as "Carlos the Jackal," a Venezuelan Marxist who had dedicated himself to pro-Palestinian terrorism, followed a similar path. In 2003, he published a book entitled Revolutionary Islam from his prison cell in France in which he encouraged "all revolutionaries, including those of the Left, even atheists," to embrace radical Islam in order to destroy the United States, which he sees as the citadel of imperialism. His terrorism began as a secular struggle. Terrorism is a preferred tactic, he writes, because it is "the cleanest and most efficient form of warfare," able to demoralize the enemy. In later years, though, he justified his actions in terms of Islamism. In March 2004, he claimed responsibility on French television for the terrorism-related deaths of between 1,500 to 2,000 people. Arguing that "not even 10 percent of these people were innocent," he refused to ask for forgiveness.Just as the sheikh did with Stewart, Sanchez established a special relationship with his attorney, Isabelle Coutant Peyre, whom he married in an Islamic ceremony in 2001. Like Stewart, Coutant Peyre gravitated from radicalism to Islam. In 2002, she told The New York Times that she shared most of Sanchez's politics, is "genuinely convinced that Western ‘militarism' is evil and that capitalism is oppressive," and does not think terrorists such as Sanchez have any "more blood on their hands than many army generals." She subsequently represented the family of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person to have been indicted in the United States in connection with the 9-11 attacks. Coutant Peyre also defended Slimane Khalfaoui, one of ten Islamic militants convicted of plotting to blow up a Christmas market in Strasbourg, France, on New Year's Eve 2000. Upon the conviction of her client, she said the judgment was "evidence that French institutions, and justice in particular, were racist, anti-Arab, and Islamophobic."
I think McCarthy is right - Stewart should be made an example of.
Judith | 10/18/06 at 12:47 AM | Categories: - Useful idiots
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/5727
Comments
She chose her path. Now she must walk down it !
Paul | October 18, 2006 07:24 AM
Personally I think the word "enabler" is fairly soft in this case.
A "Terrorist enabler" is someone who merely gives tacit or overt moral support- the parent who doesn't think it's a problem that his/her son has death propaganda all over his room and talks about the glories of martyrdom.
Stewart's role was active. She was a courier. A willing courier, between terror cells. She willingly provided a communications function for an opposeimg, hostile armed force. As an Army radio operator is still a soldier even if his only role is to relay orders, Stewart is still a terrorist.
I think this is part of a larger problem, the success of terrorist memes. They have somehow convinced us that on their side, all their auxilliary and support personnel are somehow excluded from the "real" terrorist ranks and therefore should not be considered targets. But stripped to the bare essentials, why would Stewart be a less legitimate target for a smart bomb than a military radio relay site?
Ben
Ben | October 18, 2006 10:39 AM
30 years too harsh?
I agree with Cinnamon. She's a traitor. Accordingly, she should be hanged by the neck until dead.
someone | October 18, 2006 09:52 PM













![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.keshertalk.com/nav-commenters.gif)