About Kesher Talk


NPJrecipe-sidead.jpg

Recent Comments

  • Fat Man [TypeKey Profile Page] on Che Moods : ""In plain truth, he hardly cared for them at all." And Che? He didn't give...."

« If they do strip all our defenses . . . . | Home | Whither Iraq: More Background on Bob Gates »

November 09, 2006

Jerusalem Gay Parade Now a Closeted Event

Due to the threat of terrorism in Israel, as fallout from the unfortunate death from shelling of 19 civilians in Beit Hanoun in Gaza, the Jerusalem parade will now take place as a closeted event at the stadium at the Givat Ram campus of Hebrew University.

On its original route, the parade called for an extremely high number of policeman to be on guard due to threats of violence from the ultra-orthodox, now necessary elsewhere to deal with the more than 80 terror warnings the police have received in reaction to the events at Beit Hanoun. On the current route, only 3000 police will be deployed, instead of the called for 12,000.

Despite the irony, I think it is a good compromise for all involved.

I can't see that the attempt to hold a gay parade in the city center of Jerusalem - which is extremely unpopular in the city itself - is meant to be anything other than provocative.

No doubt, democratically speaking, as the Israeli court mandated, they have that right. But in this case, the flagrant exercise of that right merely inflames hostilities.

The Virtual Talmud blog at beliefnet.com features a discussion on the issue from various branches of Judaism.

And speaking of various branches of Judaism, last week in an article in the Jerusalem Post that I unfortunately did not bookmark, I finally come across the perfect term to describe my approach to Judaism: flexodox.

Alcibiades | 11/09/06 at 10:20 AM | Categories: Eretz Yisrael

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/5831

Comments

You know we have differences of opinion on this.
But I have already seen one very VERY moderate Muslim blogger- the type we truly wish more Muslims would be- point to this as evidence that Israel is not as tolerant, free, or Democratic
as they claim to be.

Losses like that- little shifts of opinion- might be invisible but they are important and they add up.

Of course the other extreme of the Muslim world would see it differently- the Jews are corrupt if they let the gays march at all. There's no winning with some people, but I still think they blew an opportunity to show an example.

This will not go well. It is not fair or right, but it is a fact that one has to act differently when one is under a microscope. I think people across the West have forgotten- there are times to speak out, and times to shut up and not project internal disputes for others to see and exploit.

Ben

Ben | November 9, 2006 12:16 PM

Ben:

Yes, it's too bad that the authorities of a secular Jewish state can't guarantee the safety of the gay paraders against threats of Jewish extremists, who have, on very rare occasion, murdered Jewish politicians and Muslim worshippers at worship and Islamic jihaddists who target all sorts of people on a daily basis, but the gays are still being allowed to assemble on mass and in relative safety. Show me a Muslim state -- however nominally secular -- where gays are accommodated at all?

Lynne | November 10, 2006 12:20 PM

The annual march isn't intended to be provocative, but to be assertive. The point is to bring to the attention of their fellow J'mites that they exist, and have to be dealt with. The message is "we're here, we are your neighbours and your friends, we're not going anywhere, and this is just as much our city as yours; feel free to disagree with us, but don't pretend we don't exist, or that we don't have the same rights everybody else does".

It would make little sense to hold the Jerusalem Pride parade in some other city, would it? And over the 5 years or so that this parade has existed, it has had its own nature, a rather tame one, reflecting the conservative nature of the city and its residents, including the gay ones. It's not an extravaganza of crudity and exhibitionism, like the parades in NYC, SF, or Tel Aviv; it's more like the ones that take place in Middle America every year, and attract little attention from the press.

Milhouse | November 10, 2006 02:21 PM

Well, but, Jerusalem is not middle America and its parade every year attracts much attention from the press. This one was covered extensively on the front page of all the British media websites, for example.

The componenets of Jerusalem's population is also entirely different. And the fact that it is a holy city, which in my experience, weighs much on the mind of its inhabitants.

Besides there are places where being assertive is being provocative.

For the record, I'm not for a heterose*ual parade in Jerusalem either.

Beyond that, I just don't much like parades. I think of them as traffic jammers.

alcibiades [TypeKey Profile Page] | November 10, 2006 06:14 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style and URL links.
My spam filter rejects any word containing "sex" and "poker" - use asterisks like so: "p*ker")