« Not the same old kugel | Home | Schaap & Schwartz: The Super Ultra Mega Music Brains »
December 12, 2006
A Moment of Infamy

I get why the Ultra Orthodox in general and naturei karta in particular are anti-Zionist, because they believe that God will bring the Messiah and the return of the Jewish people to Israel in his own time and He cannot be hastened. Moreover, to their minds, a secular Jewish nation in Israel is only going to delay the coming of the Messiah.
However, what I don't understand is, theologically speaking, how does Naturei Karta justify Holocaust denialism.
Or, is it only that, like Ahmadinejad, they don't believe the Holocaust should have led to the development of Israel and that Jews (except them, of course) should have stayed in exile in Europe?
Or, do they want Ahmadinejad to destroy the secular state of Israel in order to bring the apocalypse and the Jewish messiah?
In short, does anyone know what their halakhic "reasoning" is specifically for Holocaust denial, which is aberrant in an altogether different way than treating with the enemies of secular Israel, such as Arafat?
UPDATE: In which the BBC provides an answer:
God knows the BBC frequently cannot be trusted when it comes to reporting on Jews and Irael. However, this reads to me like straight reporting - and the answer it provides makes sense of what I know.
In his speech to the conference, [UK based] Neturei Karta's Rabbi Cohen said there was no doubt about the Holocaust and it would be "a terrible affront to the memory of those who perished to belittle the guilt of the crime in any way".So, it is not Holocaut denial, just an extreme form of anti-Zionist ultra-ultra Orthodoxy.However, he also argued that the genocide had been divine will. "The Zionists, with their secular pompous approach behave in complete opposition to this philosophy and dare to say 'Never Again'.
"They have the audacity to think that they can prevent the Almighty from repeating a Holocaust. This is heresy."
Alcibiades | 12/12/06 at 02:55 PM | Categories: Doing Jewish
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.keshertalk.com/cgi-bin/mtb.cgi/5926
Blogs which link to A Moment of Infamy:
» The Cost of an Infamous Kiss from Kesher Talk
Remember this? A scion of Naturei Karta kissing up to 'Jad. We discussed it here. [Other naturei karta related posts are here. Turns out that Moshe Aryeh Friedman's wife didn't much like the image either, and has left him, fleeing... [Read More]
Tracked on January 15, 2007 01:51 PM
Comments
I can only guess.
(a) God protects those who love Him but the wicked He brings low. It follows that those who died in the Holocaust somehow deserved it. Therefore, the Holocaust -- as human evil -- doesn't exist.
(b) The Holocaust led to the (illegitimate) establishment of Israel by human will.
But let me offer a third guess.
(c) These guys are f***ing insane.
Attila (Pillage Idiot) | December 12, 2006 03:14 PM
madness, simply madness. Just what we needed- a Jewish poster child for the Ku Klux Klan.
Ya'akov | December 12, 2006 06:38 PM
Or, that being Jewish is observing the covenant between the individual and God, not the idolatry of material land worship promoted by Zionism, which wouldn't be so bad if it didn't come on the backs of others.
Alan Goldstein | December 12, 2006 07:24 PM
Ultra-orthodox is a meaningless term. Orthodox Jews run through a variety of spectrums on their position on Israel.
The Neturei Karta though are alone in embracing Islamic terrorists, Neo-Nazis and Louis Farrakhan. This is in part because
A. They've received funding from the Palestinians and other Arab money.
B. The current groups of people calling them Neturei Karta have an iffy connection to the actual Neturei Karta and are as often as not a bunch of very messed up people, not all of them Orthodox or religious.
There's not much in the way of halachic reasoning going on, just cutting and pasting textually anti-zionist quotes from Rabbinic figures in the 19th century and the usual three oaths business, which takes all of 5 minutes to shoot down since Israel was created legally under the authority of the League of Nations and the UN.
sultan knish | December 12, 2006 07:43 PM
We are Jewish.
We hate Jews.
QED
M. Simon
| December 12, 2006 08:20 PM
An interesting take on three oaths.
M. Simon
| December 12, 2006 08:28 PM
"Ultra-orthodox is a meaningless term. Orthodox Jews run through a variety of spectrums on their position on Israel."
Yeah, but they are all crazy. When you try to discuss something with them they start yelling at you within 5 minutes. I am still very glad to be not Orthodox.
Robert Schwartz
| December 12, 2006 08:44 PM
Well speaking as one of them crazy Orthodox fellas, I promise to wait at least 10 minutes before yelling at you.
sultan knish | December 13, 2006 01:24 AM
Interesting piece on the three oaths.
It should be pointed out also that their source is an aggadata gemara and there were widely differing views on the extent to which something like that can be binding.
Anti-zionists typically tend to quote the authorities that support their case and ignore everything else.
Personally I feel the simplest position is to point out there was never any violation as the State of Israel was created through the consent of the nations, there was no mass ascension 'Behomah' 'In a Wall' but a staggered process over a century and a half
sultan knish | December 13, 2006 02:00 AM
Nothing more than standard hyper-religious nihilism then. Nothing happens that is not the Will of God, therefore it makes no sense to actually do anything.
They have many blind spots, the most obvious of which is this: If historical events like the Holocaust are the will of God, why isn;t the founding of Israel also the will of God? We can even go paradoxical- perhaps it is the God's will that people deny that the Holocaust is God's will. In fact, the whole "will of God" thing eventually boils down to a mess. If we accept that all events happen because they are God's will, we must then recognize the fact that on the most basic level, God's will looks an awful lot like the mathematical laws of probability. Of course, that may be the will of God.
One thing is clear: they should not have flown to Iran. If it was God's will that they attend the conference, He would have transported them there.
These are the sort of people who simply wouldn't get that old joke about the guy who prays to win the lottery, and gets an answer from God: "Help me out on this one. Buy a ticket."
Ben
Ben | December 13, 2006 07:44 AM
I think Attila's analysis is the most likely: they're nuts.
Alex Bensky | December 13, 2006 09:44 AM
In my opinion, they--and everyone else--make up their religion as they go along.
My aunt had a friend who would not cut his grass, he said it was against God's will. Go figure.
miriam's ideas
| December 13, 2006 01:21 PM
All these nuts deserve each other. Come to think of it, if your going to bomb Tehran I could not think of a better time.
Rob | December 13, 2006 05:50 PM
They don't think of God's will as some philosophical conundrum. They 'know' what God's will is and its conveniently fits their prejudices and agenda.
sultan knish | December 14, 2006 09:54 AM
much as Ahmenajidad doesn't sit around all day wondering what Allah's will is. He knows what Allah's will is.
It's for him to have lots of power and kills lots of Jews and other infidels.
Convenient, isn't it
sultan knish | December 14, 2006 10:06 AM
ISRAEL NOT A SECULAR STATE
--------------------------
Alcibiades,
How can you say that israel is a secular state, when NOT all citizens are equal and the distinction is drawn along religious lines???
That's secular to you Alcibiades?
Al | December 14, 2006 10:33 AM
Well you know the conference is bad when the Guardian has a leader that condemns it despite they knew about the ensueing storm of hatred from Jew-haters.
Andrew Ian Dodge | December 14, 2006 10:56 AM
Sultan,
I'm in agreement about your take on the three oaths.
Israel's inceptiion was by peaceful political means. It was a gift. The war didn't start until after the gift was given.
I posted to that effect at the site.
Ben,
Superrposition doesn't collapse until there is an observer. So maybe it is the will of the maker to create an observer to give the universe form.
Interesting thought no?
M. Simon
| December 14, 2006 11:14 AM
Yes, the anti-zionist counter to this is that the Arab nations were the ones who got to decide if Israel was to be created or not.
But the League of Nations, England via the Balfour Declaration and the UN represented a global consensus. Israel had been in the hands of the British up to that point and under the authority of an international mandate... not in the hands of the Arabs. Thus on the authority of those who governed the land, Israel was recognized as a state.
One can make the direct analogy with the second temple where the ruling empire gave permission but some of the locals living in the area engaged in hostilities to the Jewish return. It was the ruling empire however that mattered.
sultan knish | December 14, 2006 12:53 PM
This is simple.
Stupidity and rationalization are the second and third most powerful forces in the universe, following ignorance.
I feel sorry for those they teach
epaminondas | December 14, 2006 07:44 PM
So many Bens here *cough*
Hehe the picture shows them kissing.
Those anti-zionist jews are talking to that guy that wants to kill all jews, WTF is that? Those Jews should be banned from Israel, because they are acting very non-jewish. They wants all other jews to die?
Ben Justesco | December 15, 2006 12:45 AM
What is that wonderful old Ashkenazic expression of disgust... ...Feh!
Talmudic scholarship of such a quality reminds me of the joke about the guy who pretends that he wants to reneg on a promise to a friend to live with him for a year, rent free, so the impoverished friend can build a nest egg.
The rabbi, after over a week of deliberation, approves of the reneg. So the two friends return to the "renegger's" home to settle accounts. The "renegger" declines the friend's rental fees, saying his only purpose in bringing the matter to the rabbi was for his guest to see what an idiot the rabbi was before he left to rejoin his family after a year's separation.
Lynne | December 15, 2006 09:23 AM












